<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reapplying the Decal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal</link>
	<description>Implicit Definition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:52:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidifort</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal/comment-page-1#comment-51420</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidifort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal#comment-51420</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all your work on Decal and the time you have given us in its creation and development. Some are grateful for your efforts and some are not it seems. The majority of us playing use decal and do appreciate what you have done though.

I stumbled in to this site through the Rangers on WE as they have this linked and i was glad and happy to see this. I got back to the very early days of AC in 2000 right after it started and remember how tedious it was with all the mouse clicks and movements you had to make and decal sure helped my wrists with this.

Thank you!

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all your work on Decal and the time you have given us in its creation and development. Some are grateful for your efforts and some are not it seems. The majority of us playing use decal and do appreciate what you have done though.</p>
<p>I stumbled in to this site through the Rangers on WE as they have this linked and i was glad and happy to see this. I got back to the very early days of AC in 2000 right after it started and remember how tedious it was with all the mouse clicks and movements you had to make and decal sure helped my wrists with this.</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bhodi Amashi</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal/comment-page-1#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Bhodi Amashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal#comment-454</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s odd that Sweet Mary continues on her crusade against Decal, while at the same time using Decal to run a &quot;buffbot&quot; for her allegiance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s odd that Sweet Mary continues on her crusade against Decal, while at the same time using Decal to run a &#8220;buffbot&#8221; for her allegiance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Dark</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal/comment-page-1#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Dark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal#comment-409</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny how a little statement can make people worry. I&#039;m sure the Decal Devs would have said by now if they were going to intentionally break this plug-in or that one. 

Great article, great work both past and present, keep it up and hope to see ya IG sometime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how a little statement can make people worry. I&#8217;m sure the Decal Devs would have said by now if they were going to intentionally break this plug-in or that one. </p>
<p>Great article, great work both past and present, keep it up and hope to see ya IG sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal/comment-page-1#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 05:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Lolitha, your little speech about progress does not fit for games. Games or sports don’t see “aids” as progress, there’s another name for it... Cheating.

And since AC is the only place that its become acceptable, that’s mostly what’s left of AC... a community of cheaters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lolitha, your little speech about progress does not fit for games. Games or sports don’t see “aids” as progress, there’s another name for it&#8230; Cheating.</p>
<p>And since AC is the only place that its become acceptable, that’s mostly what’s left of AC&#8230; a community of cheaters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lolitha</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal/comment-page-1#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Lolitha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal#comment-400</guid>
		<description>Thanks a ton for the informative article... all i can say about the &quot;hack&quot; contraversy is.... washing machines and moving pictures used to be the devil.... i can&#039;t imagine ever going back to scrubbing my clothes on a rock or sitting beside a radio trying to imagine a storyline... but oh well, that&#039;s just me...  It is all the same.  Technology perserveres and we always try to find ways to make our lives easier and more fulfilling by taking away the tedium in it... &quot;hack&quot; on gentlemen and thanks again for your efforts =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a ton for the informative article&#8230; all i can say about the &#8220;hack&#8221; contraversy is&#8230;. washing machines and moving pictures used to be the devil&#8230;. i can&#8217;t imagine ever going back to scrubbing my clothes on a rock or sitting beside a radio trying to imagine a storyline&#8230; but oh well, that&#8217;s just me&#8230;  It is all the same.  Technology perserveres and we always try to find ways to make our lives easier and more fulfilling by taking away the tedium in it&#8230; &#8220;hack&#8221; on gentlemen and thanks again for your efforts =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karki</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal/comment-page-1#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Karki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Great article. Thanks for all of your hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. Thanks for all of your hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadrackur</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal/comment-page-1#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadrackur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Grats on a totally excellent article...:)

I really appreciate someone taking the time to explain the complexity of the task.

It&#039;s hard to imagine people complaining about decal considering that everytime someone walked into and interacted with a tradebot...it was decal that was pumping the blood through it&#039;s tradebot heart..:-P

Great work...:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grats on a totally excellent article&#8230;:)</p>
<p>I really appreciate someone taking the time to explain the complexity of the task.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to imagine people complaining about decal considering that everytime someone walked into and interacted with a tradebot&#8230;it was decal that was pumping the blood through it&#8217;s tradebot heart..:-P</p>
<p>Great work&#8230;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tehanu</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal/comment-page-1#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Tehanu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the very informative articles. 99.9% of the players out there either greatly appreciate the time you folks put into developing Decal, or they don&#039;t use Decal and don&#039;t get bothered by the fact that others do.

Just a warning: Please don&#039;t feed the trolls. Sweet Mary is a hack in the same sense that John Stewart used to describe the former hosts of Crossfire when he was on the show. In fact, the name Sweet Mary, being associated with vitriolic complaints and vigilantism, could have been entered by anybody. So perhaps Sweet Mary is a hack in more than one sense.

Life&#039;s too special and too short to spend it being bitter about a game. Don&#039;t let yourself get riled up by what is likely either a cesspool of bitterness or a hacker just trying to be a troll by using a moniker made infamous by the bitterness associated with the name.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the very informative articles. 99.9% of the players out there either greatly appreciate the time you folks put into developing Decal, or they don&#8217;t use Decal and don&#8217;t get bothered by the fact that others do.</p>
<p>Just a warning: Please don&#8217;t feed the trolls. Sweet Mary is a hack in the same sense that John Stewart used to describe the former hosts of Crossfire when he was on the show. In fact, the name Sweet Mary, being associated with vitriolic complaints and vigilantism, could have been entered by anybody. So perhaps Sweet Mary is a hack in more than one sense.</p>
<p>Life&#8217;s too special and too short to spend it being bitter about a game. Don&#8217;t let yourself get riled up by what is likely either a cesspool of bitterness or a hacker just trying to be a troll by using a moniker made infamous by the bitterness associated with the name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sucamarto</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal/comment-page-1#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Sucamarto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 05:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal#comment-384</guid>
		<description>Great works guys, cant wait for the next version of my favorite self buffing plugin to be released;.

Cheers
Sucamarto</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great works guys, cant wait for the next version of my favorite self buffing plugin to be released;.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Sucamarto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cd Locke</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal/comment-page-1#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Cd Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/08/08/reapplying-the-decal#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Sweet Mary !! Now Now be sweet and kind as I know you can
be.  We both know your capible of it.  Why the bad words?
You should slap your fingers for leaving that post!!!!

Locke Cd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet Mary !! Now Now be sweet and kind as I know you can<br />
be.  We both know your capible of it.  Why the bad words?<br />
You should slap your fingers for leaving that post!!!!</p>
<p>Locke Cd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
