<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AJAX is a cleaning product</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/04/29/ajax-is-a-cleaning-product/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/04/29/ajax-is-a-cleaning-product</link>
	<description>Implicit Definition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:52:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Stemen</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/04/29/ajax-is-a-cleaning-product/comment-page-1#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Stemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 19:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/04/29/ajax-is-a-cleaning-product#comment-221</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see more people start cleaning up the terminology. What tends to happen is that a researcher makes up some terminology that&#039;s not widely understood and just makes sence in a niche. When someone makes a working app, usually they clean things up a bit (not always). When marketing takes over they&#039;ll do a combination of fixing up terminology and making buzzwords. It&#039;s not until the idea&#039;s been taught a lot and published in a few books that the terminology really gets cleaned up.

We could do our part by offering new sets of terminology that make more sense. Ideally their meaning would be fairly intuitive so when you used them people that use the old terms would know what you&#039;re talking about. If we&#039;re lucky, they might catch on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see more people start cleaning up the terminology. What tends to happen is that a researcher makes up some terminology that&#8217;s not widely understood and just makes sence in a niche. When someone makes a working app, usually they clean things up a bit (not always). When marketing takes over they&#8217;ll do a combination of fixing up terminology and making buzzwords. It&#8217;s not until the idea&#8217;s been taught a lot and published in a few books that the terminology really gets cleaned up.</p>
<p>We could do our part by offering new sets of terminology that make more sense. Ideally their meaning would be fairly intuitive so when you used them people that use the old terms would know what you&#8217;re talking about. If we&#8217;re lucky, they might catch on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.archgrove.co.uk @ 2012-02-06 09:14:00 -->
