<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software patents within the European Union</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/04/08/software-patents-within-the-european-union/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/04/08/software-patents-within-the-european-union</link>
	<description>Implicit Definition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:52:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archgrove - Implicit Definition &#187; Software patents update</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/04/08/software-patents-within-the-european-union/comment-page-1#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Archgrove - Implicit Definition &#187; Software patents update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2005 12:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/?p=8#comment-178</guid>
		<description>[...] Filed under: Uncategorized &#8212; Adam Wright @ 1:46 pm  	 	 			Nearly 2 months after the letters were sent, here is the breakdown. 	 	Lib Dems - N [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Filed under: Uncategorized &#8212; Adam Wright @ 1:46 pm  	 	 			Nearly 2 months after the letters were sent, here is the breakdown. 	 	Lib Dems &#8211; N [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archgrove - Implicit Definition &#187; Daniel Hannan responds</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/04/08/software-patents-within-the-european-union/comment-page-1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Archgrove - Implicit Definition &#187; Daniel Hannan responds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/?p=8#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] :00 pm  	 	 			Daniel Hannan, Conservative MEP for South East England, has responded to my letter regarding software patents. Unfortunately, he does [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] :00 pm  	 	 			Daniel Hannan, Conservative MEP for South East England, has responded to my letter regarding software patents. Unfortunately, he does [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archgrove - Implicit Definition &#187; Again, no new responses on Software Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/04/08/software-patents-within-the-european-union/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Archgrove - Implicit Definition &#187; Again, no new responses on Software Patents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/?p=8#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] ramming &#8212; Adam Wright @ 11:08 pm  	 	 			Again, the big 3 parties failed to reply to my letter. If nothing arrives tomorrow, that&#8217;s an e [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ramming &#8212; Adam Wright @ 11:08 pm  	 	 			Again, the big 3 parties failed to reply to my letter. If nothing arrives tomorrow, that&#8217;s an e [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archgrove - Implicit Definition &#187; No new replies today</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/04/08/software-patents-within-the-european-union/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Archgrove - Implicit Definition &#187; No new replies today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/?p=8#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] s today 	Filed under: Politics, Code &#8212; adamw @ 11:50 am  	 	 			No new replies to my software patents letter today. I&#8217;m still waiting fo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] s today 	Filed under: Politics, Code &#8212; adamw @ 11:50 am  	 	 			No new replies to my software patents letter today. I&#8217;m still waiting fo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archgrove - Implicit Definition &#187; A 2 working day response from the UKIP</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/04/08/software-patents-within-the-european-union/comment-page-1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Archgrove - Implicit Definition &#187; A 2 working day response from the UKIP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/?p=8#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] Farage (The South East UK Independence Party MEP) has weighed in with their response to my letter. As expected, it sides with the anti patent lobby, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Farage (The South East UK Independence Party MEP) has weighed in with their response to my letter. As expected, it sides with the anti patent lobby, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archgrove - Implicit Definition &#187; Top marks for the Green party</title>
		<link>http://www.archgrove.co.uk/weblog/2005/04/08/software-patents-within-the-european-union/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Archgrove - Implicit Definition &#187; Top marks for the Green party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archgrove.co.uk/?p=8#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] y landed on my desk this morning, less than half a working day since I sent my letter (see Software patents within the EU). Post marked Sunday, the Gree [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] y landed on my desk this morning, less than half a working day since I sent my letter (see Software patents within the EU). Post marked Sunday, the Gree [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
